A number of frequent verbs have irregular past involvements, the forms of which are worth remembering: one of the most difficult parts of past mastery is the refinement of the subject agreement. When should you apply certain contractual rules and when can you ignore them? In the previous section, we found that the past corresponds to the theme of reflexive verbs. But in fact, one could say that it corresponds to the direct object, since the whole point of a reflexive verb is that the subject and the object are essentially „the same“. In one case such as: For example, the female form of falling has fallen; The plural form of gone went. As you may expect, we will not add any more -s if the past party already ends in -s. Thus, the past participant to sit (to sit) remains seated in the male plural (although it becomes in the female and plural singular in Assisi or sitting). 1. For verbs usually combined with „tre“ (the „movement verbs“; see auxiliary), the participatory precedent in number and sex is consistent with the subject: In reality, speakers do not tend to add chords with having in the everyday language. They probably only make these agreements by speaking carefully and thinking about the written language when they speak.
So if they don`t read a script, people would generally say that there are two ways to combine the participatory past or the past of the main verb. In English, you usually add -ed to make the main adverb a former participant. Imagine these two rules as the French version of the addition of -ed. When you use compound spent time, things are easy when you talk about one person. You only use the voltage-laden past endings you`ve already learned. Gender can also influence your sentence. If you only talk about your good friend Marc, you can participate in the past as it is. If you`re talking about Brigitte, you need to add an un accented extra at the end of the verb. When we talk about a past action that was in progress and that did not have a clear point of resignation. There is no gender agreement or numbers. Good news, isn`t it? If you use Imperfect, you don`t have to worry about the French verb chord in terms of numbers or genres! Bless yourself, imperfect, you are so much simpler than the compound past.
You have it. Matching themes and verbs in the past sounds scary, but if you can practice these three categories and memorize them, you`re on track to communicate past events with more skill and self-confidence! But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. Note that none of the verbs in this category (except hatch > hatched) have old entries that end in a consonant.